Head to head
Crunchbase vs Wellfound
Crunchbase leads the BLP Index (73 vs 58). Crunchbase has more raw reach. Wellfound is fairer for founders without a network. Crunchbase scores higher on AI visibility.
| Dimension | Crunchbase | Wellfound |
|---|---|---|
| BLP Index | 73 | 58 |
| Rank | #6 | #62 |
| Type | Directories | Communities |
| Cycle | ongoing | ongoing |
| Listing cost | Free to claim a company page | Free company profile |
| Audience | Journalists, investors, operators, and retrieval systems | Startup candidates and operators |
| Traffic | Brand search and research sessions; not launch-day | Candidate traffic, not users of your product |
| Backlink | High-authority profile URL | High-authority profile; typically nofollow |
| Reach | 72 | 64 |
| Intent | 60 | 40 |
| Fairness | 48 | 60 |
| Evergreen | 90 | 72 |
| AI visibility | 88 | 48 |
| Ease | 78 | 70 |
Crunchbase
Claim your organization page. Keep funding, team, and description true. This is entity SEO, not a launch. Pro is a data product, not a ranking you can buy.
Crunchbase is how a lot of the internet answers ‘what is this company.’ An unclaimed or stale page is how assistants invent your headcount. Claiming is free for the basics; Pro is for people who sell with the data.
Full Crunchbase guideWellfound
A company profile here supports recruiting and a public existence. It will not launch a consumer product.
Wellfound (formerly AngelList Talent) is how many startups hire and how many candidates still discover companies. A complete profile with a real launch post in the updates feed is useful. It is not a hunter board.
Full Wellfound guide