Head to head
directree vs PeerPush
directree leads the BLP Index (66 vs 60). directree has more raw reach. directree is fairer for founders without a network. PeerPush scores higher on AI visibility.
| Dimension | directree | PeerPush |
|---|---|---|
| BLP Index | 66 | 60 |
| Rank | #25 | #50 |
| Type | AI / GEO | AI / GEO |
| Cycle | ongoing | ongoing |
| Listing cost | Free | Free queue |
| Audience | SaaS buyers and models that want labeled facts | Answer engines first; humans second |
| Traffic | Directory drip; GEO is the upside | Little direct traffic; value is machine retrieval |
| Backlink | Claimed dofollow for verified listings — confirm | Paid instant option typically includes a backlink |
| Reach | 32 | 22 |
| Intent | 70 | 45 |
| Fairness | 86 | 78 |
| Evergreen | 74 | 74 |
| AI visibility | 70 | 84 |
| Ease | 80 | 82 |
directree
Free listing, claimed dofollow when verified, no pay-to-rank. Built for people (and models) who are tired of unlabeled AI sludge on software directories.
directree is an honest-SaaS directory: each fact is supposed to be tagged Observed (crawled), AI-inferred (marked), or Founder-edited. Submit and claim are free; they advertise a dofollow backlink for verified listings and say there are no paid rank slots.
Full directree guidePeerPush
A GEO-first directory. Instant listing plus backlink is paid; the free queue is slower. Not a substitute for Product Hunt — a vote in retrieval systems.
PeerPush is one of the first directories that says the quiet part out loud: the customer is no longer only a human browsing a board. The listing is structured so answer engines can cite the product when someone asks for tools in a category.
Full PeerPush guide