Head to head
FutureTools vs There's An AI For That
There's An AI For That leads the BLP Index (77 vs 71). There's An AI For That has more raw reach. FutureTools is fairer for founders without a network. There's An AI For That scores higher on AI visibility.
| Dimension | FutureTools | There's An AI For That |
|---|---|---|
| BLP Index | 71 | 77 |
| Rank | #10 | #2 |
| Type | AI / GEO | AI / GEO |
| Cycle | ongoing | ongoing |
| Listing cost | Free to submit | Free to submit |
| Audience | People (and crawlers) looking for AI tools by job-to-be-done | People searching for an AI tool for a job-to-be-done |
| Traffic | Category pages can be large; your slice is smaller | Long-tail task pages; site-level traffic is large, your share is not guaranteed |
| Backlink | Directory link; verify rel | Directory listing; follow attributes vary — check |
| Reach | 62 | 78 |
| Intent | 74 | 70 |
| Fairness | 58 | 58 |
| Evergreen | 80 | 88 |
| AI visibility | 78 | 90 |
| Ease | 72 | 72 |
FutureTools
FutureTools is one of the better-known AI directories after TAAFT. Submission is a form plus wait. Ranking inside a category is the prize, not ‘getting listed.’
Matt Wolfe’s FutureTools catalog is a filter on the AI-tool firehose. Getting in is not automatic. Once in, you sit next to fifty other ‘AI for X’ products. Category rank and a real demo matter more than the badge.
Full FutureTools guideThere's An AI For That
If you are an AI product, you list here. Traffic is comparison-shaped, not launch-day-shaped. Task pages compound for months.
There's An AI For That (TAAFT) is the large public index of AI tools. People (and models) land on task pages — “AI for meeting notes” — not on a leaderboard you can game for 24 hours. Being listed is table stakes for AI products in 2026; ranking on a task page is the actual prize.
Full There's An AI For That guide