Head to head
FutureTools vs Toolify
Toolify leads the BLP Index (72 vs 71). Toolify has more raw reach. FutureTools is fairer for founders without a network. Toolify scores higher on AI visibility.
| Dimension | FutureTools | Toolify |
|---|---|---|
| BLP Index | 71 | 72 |
| Rank | #10 | #9 |
| Type | AI / GEO | AI / GEO |
| Cycle | ongoing | ongoing |
| Listing cost | Free to submit | Free to submit |
| Audience | People (and crawlers) looking for AI tools by job-to-be-done | Operators comparing AI tools |
| Traffic | Category pages can be large; your slice is smaller | Category and search drip; paid rank is a different motion |
| Backlink | Directory link; verify rel | Directory backlink; verify rel |
| Reach | 62 | 72 |
| Intent | 74 | 68 |
| Fairness | 58 | 54 |
| Evergreen | 80 | 84 |
| AI visibility | 78 | 82 |
| Ease | 72 | 70 |
FutureTools
FutureTools is one of the better-known AI directories after TAAFT. Submission is a form plus wait. Ranking inside a category is the prize, not ‘getting listed.’
Matt Wolfe’s FutureTools catalog is a filter on the AI-tool firehose. Getting in is not automatic. Once in, you sit next to fifty other ‘AI for X’ products. Category rank and a real demo matter more than the badge.
Full FutureTools guideToolify
Second catalog you list on after TAAFT. Useful for comparison SEO. Paid ranking is optional and obvious — do not confuse it with earned placement.
Toolify indexes tens of thousands of AI tools with categories, estimated traffic, and leaderboard-style pages. Organic listing is the baseline; paid boosts exist and should be disclosed in your own head even if the UI is shiny.
Full Toolify guide