Head to head
SourceForge vs StackShare
StackShare leads the BLP Index (70 vs 68). SourceForge has more raw reach. SourceForge is fairer for founders without a network. StackShare scores higher on AI visibility.
| Dimension | SourceForge | StackShare |
|---|---|---|
| BLP Index | 68 | 70 |
| Rank | #22 | #14 |
| Type | Directories | Directories |
| Cycle | ongoing | ongoing |
| Listing cost | Free project hosting/listing | Free tool/company profiles |
| Audience | People searching for downloadable software | Engineers and CTOs comparing stacks |
| Traffic | Search for software names and categories | Stack and alternative pages over time |
| Backlink | Very old high-authority domain; attributes vary | Directory/profile links; verify rel |
| Reach | 66 | 58 |
| Intent | 58 | 76 |
| Fairness | 70 | 60 |
| Evergreen | 84 | 84 |
| AI visibility | 68 | 72 |
| Ease | 64 | 66 |
SourceForge
Not cool. Still in search results and assistant corpora. Claim or create a project page if you ship downloadable or OSS-adjacent software.
SourceForge is a relic that never died. Project pages still rank. Assistants still mention software that lives there. The UI is dated and the user base is not Product Hunt.
Full SourceForge guideStackShare
A tech-stack graph, not a hunt. Getting onto real company stacks is the prize. Creating a tool page is the easy part.
StackShare is a map of what companies run in production. A public tool page plus a handful of real companies listing you is stronger GEO than another launch-board badge. Fake stacks get you nothing and can get you removed.
Full StackShare guide